Charity AI use lacks practical governance, trustee visibility and staff/volunteer rules.
Charity AI Governance Pack & Implementation
Adapt the House AI-governance kernel to charity accountability and operating realities.
Charity AI use lacks practical governance, trustee visibility and staff/volunteer rules.
For: Small charities.
Project fee
The charity's AI use, trustee or senior sponsorship, implementation boundary and exact price are agreed before commitment.
Charity accountability · practical staff and volunteer rules · no trustee legal advice, compliance guarantee or regulator certification
Does this sound familiar?
What you will receive
Charity-adapted policy
AI governance framed for the agreed charity context.
SOP
A practical operating procedure for the agreed AI use.
Roles
Clear responsibilities for the governance and operation in scope.
Training or briefing
Practical support for staff, volunteers or decision-makers who need to apply the rules.
Implementation checklist
A clear route from policy into day-to-day use.
A defined charity-governance engagement
- Service type
- Professional service
- Delivery
- Remote
- Pricing
- Project fee
A trustee or senior sponsor, current charity systems, relevant legal and guidance sources, implementation scope and exact fee are confirmed before commitment.
What needs to be in place?
Trustee/senior sponsor; current charity systems; relevant legal/guidance sources.
What is outside the scope?
No trustee legal advice, compliance guarantee or regulator certification.
Is this the right service for our charity?
It is intended for small charities where AI use needs clearer practical governance, trustee visibility and usable staff or volunteer rules.
Start with current use
Where is AI already being used?
Tell us the tools, users, existing rules and what trustees or managers need to understand. We will define the governance boundary before anything is agreed.